International Journal of Radiology and Radiation Oncology

Editorial       Open Access      Peer-Reviewed

Timing of Annual Output Calibration of Radiotherapy Linear Accelerators

Murshed Hossain*

Lead Radiation Physicist, Unity Point Health Trinity Cancer Center, Moline, IL 61265, USA

Author and article information

*Corresponding author: Murshed Hossain, Lead Radiation Physicist, Unity Point Health Trinity Cancer Center, Moline, IL 61265, USA, E-mail: [email protected]
Submited: 18 January, 2016 | Accepted: 18 January, 2016 | Published: 23 January, 2016

Cite this as

Hossain M (2016) Timing of Annual Output Calibration of Radiotherapy Linear Accelerators. Int J Radiol Radiat Oncol. 2016; 2(1): 008-008. Available from: 10.17352/ijrro.000011

Copyright License

© 2016 Hossain M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

The output of radiotherapy Linear Accelerators (Linacs) is calibrated  following  national  or  international  protocols  like TG-51 by  the  American Association  of  Physicists  in  Medicine  [1] or  TRS-398 by the International Atomic Energy Agency [2], annually on or before the anniversary date of the commissioning of each Linac.The anniversary  dates fall  at  random  times  around  the  year.  Is  there  a better time for annual output calibration than on random anniversary dates? In view of the recent report of seasonal output variation [3,4],it  is  time  to  consider  performing  annual  output  calibration  in  the months not having extreme air humidity.

The output of radiotherapy Linear Accelerators (Linacs) is calibrated following national or international protocols like TG-51 by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine [1] or TRS-398 by the International Atomic Energy Agency [2], annually on or before the anniversary date of the commissioning of each Linac. The anniversary dates fall at random times around the year. Is there a better time for annual output calibration than on random anniversary dates? In view of the recent report of seasonal output variation [3,4], it is time to consider performing annual output calibration in the months not having extreme air humidity.

It is reported that the output may have annual variation of about ±1.5% from the average [Figure 15, Ref. 3]. There are ways to correct the ion chamber readings for humidity in addition to temperature and pressure [Figure 5.14 Ref. 5]. This correction factor can have a maximum value of about ±0.5%. This is consistent with the reported seasonal variation when the daily Linac output is adjusted by the measurements taken during the monthly quality assurance as reported in Figure 16 of Ref. 3. The additional 1% of the variation in Figure 15 Ref. 3 is probably due to seasonal effects on electronics or other factors. It is speculated that humidity may also influence the conducting plates of the accelerator monitor chambers thereby affecting the output [6].

Institutions having multiple Linacs which are equivalent in terms of the geometry and energy are often matched with each other so that an average calibration factor can be used for each energy across all appropriate Linacs for monthly output calibration. But, if the annual calibration is done on or near the anniversary date of each Linac then a difference between the average monthly calibration factor over all Linacs and the one determined from the annual calibration may differ due to seasonal output variation. As a result of this difference the monthly calibration following the annual calibration will require output adjustments for most Linacs.

Depending on the stability of the Linac output and the action level for output adjustment there can be on average 6-7 output adjustments needed per year [3]. However, as suggested in this writing if the annual calibration is performed in the months not having extreme atmospheric humidity then it may require less number of adjustments per year.

  1. Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, Hanson WF, Huq MS, et al. (1999) AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys 26: 1847-1870.
  2. Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfeld K. Huq MS, Kanai T, et al. (2000) Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, IAEA Technical Report Series No. 398 .
  3. Hossain M (2014) Output trends, characteristics, and measurements of three megavoltage radiotherapy linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15: 4783 .
  4. Chan MF, Li Q, Tang X, Li X, Li J, et al. (2015) Visual Analysis of the Daily QA Results of Photon and Electron Beams of a Trilogy Linac over a Five-Year Period. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology 4: 290-299 .
  5. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 31 (1979) Average Energy Required to Produce an Ion Pair. ICRU, Washington DC.
  6. Blad B, Nilsson P, Knoos T (1996) The influence of air humidity on an unsealed ionization chamber in a linear accelerator. Phys Med Biol 41: 2541-2548 .
 

Article Alerts

Subscribe to our articles alerts and stay tuned.


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Help ?